Close
Log On User Log On
Facebook: Josh Woodward Twitter: Josh Woodward Google+: Josh Woodward YouTube: Josh Woodward Josh Woodward RSS Feed
Josh Woodward: Songs For People Who Like Things
Obama '08
Gallery

New MP3: Article 39 out of 65 Slowly But Surely


  

Obama '08

Posted on Mon, Mar 3, 2008

I try not to get overly political here, but tomorrow, we here in Ohio (and you in Texas, Vermont and Rhode Island) have a critical decision to make in the primaries.

I'm supporting Barack Obama, and I just wanted to say why:

  • Obama has been against the war in Iraq from day one. I truly doubt that Hillary would have handled the situation much differently than George Bush.
  • His limited amount of "experience" in Washington is an asset to me. He's taken the high road and hasn't fallen into the pockets of lobbyists.
  • He truly understands technology issues, which is important to me, and will be critical to the nation in the coming years.
  • He has liberal values, but has shown an ability to reach across the aisle and appeal to both parties. This will be critical in getting elected, and in getting things done once in office.
  • His positions have been consistent and from the heart. It seems like Hillary doesn't sneeze unless a focus group tells her to.
  • I believe he has the best chance of beating John McCain, who looks like he's going to be a tough opponent. For better or worse, Hillary is divisive to the party.
  • Obama is, well... likable. This is the factor that ideally wouldn't be important, but it's important for a President to be able to rally the nation behind a given cause. Hillary says that oratory doesn't matter - I have to disagree.

No matter who you support, please vote tomorrow. I hope you'll consider voting for Obama. Thanks, and I now return you to your regularly scheduled rock and roll music. :)

Printable Version of This Article

Email This Article to a Friend

Discuss
  Discussion: Obama '08

Reply SD (anonymous) on Mar 5, 2008 @ 3:51am
[No Subject]
Personally, I'd like to see Ron Paul as president... but he didn't get enough media coverage to get anywhere above the top three in the Republican party. He was a long shot, but I'm putting him as a write-in. Besides, if he did win by some miracle, he'd likely get assassinated by black ops... That aside, I'm glad you support Obama over Hillary. Of all the "major" parties I've seen, he's the best.
Reply Asa Bour (anonymous) on May 21, 2008 @ 9:44am
Socialism
We are facing a tidal wave of over 75 million souls whose earning days will be behind them. Social Security, interest on bank CDs, and dividends on stocks will be needed to provide retirement income. Barrack Obama wants to savagely slash the living standard of retirees by increasing taxes on dividends. It’s a non-starter. The WSJ correctly labels candidate Obama “a true income redistributor who prefers high tax rates as a matter of ideological dogma regardless of the revenue consequences. Are you ready for much higher taxes?
User Thumbnail
Back  Reply View Account Josh Woodward on May 21, 2008 @ 9:46am
Socialism
Ready and willing. :)
Back  Reply bill (anonymous) on Aug 26, 2010 @ 1:05pm
Socialism

I must apologize in advance for 1) my english because I'm french 2) the fact that I take part to a discussion without knowing every little details because I'm french again 3) to dig up an old post

but it seemed important to me to send you an oversea's opinion about socialism. Very often I read or hear something about socialism from american people saying it's bad it's evil, it's against freedom... Everyone has the right to vote what they want of course, but it's like you don't see all of the picture because you live too far from the painting...

I've been living for fourteen years during Mitterand in a country who had a little bit more of socialism than today. Even at the end of 90's we still had a lot of "nationalized" companies (I'm sorry I don't know the english word) It meant no competition with other companies, no price raising and the security of the government to make it work.

Sarkozy has been leading the country "the american way" as we say in France. Meaning that every company is now private, one after the other. Capitalism is not freedom, it's less control from the government which is different. Socialism gives controls over a lot of things in order to bring a certain harmony, not especially to tyrannise people as we sometimes saw during the last century. It's up to us to vote for people able to create a socialist democratic country.

Higher taxes are here to help the one who need it. We all needed or will need the help of government if we lose our job, social security when we are sick, or retirement when we are old. If no taxes are paid accordingly to our living standard (low rate for the less wealthy, high rate for the most ones) no one could get any help. This is selfish, I call it "capitalist totalitarism" because you think you have power over your life, but you don't.

Sorry again to get back to this old conversation, this was my voice today, aug 26th 2010.


Post a Message:
(You are posting anonymously)
(required, but not shown)
Validation String

This article has been viewed 7144 times.